Convenience at a cost

The last time I mentioned Amazon's Kindle, it was in that dismissive, mocking tone I reserve for things I don't fully understand. Basically, I was incredulous that anybody would shell out several hundred bucks for a device that seemed much less convenient than the paperback book it purports to replace.

Now, as is so often the case, I see that I was wrong. As this piece in Slate points out, the second generation Kindle "makes buying, storing, and organizing your favorite books and magazines effortless. You can take your entire library with you wherever you go and switch from reading the latest New Yorker to the latest best-seller without rolling out of bed. ... The Kindle is the future of publishing."

OK, that shows how much I know. If you've got an extra $359 around to buy one, fine. But keep reading the Slate article: the thrust of it is not how great the Kindle is, but how bad it might eventually become for this pursuit we call reading. The problem is twofold: No more reselling or sharing the e-books you buy, and everything you buy must come from Amazon.

Sounds like the Kindle has become cool and convenient enough to become the next iPod. But with that kind of acceptance, it makes you wonder what might eventually become of public libraries. Applying DRM to the printed word just seems wrong -- no matter how convenient it might seem now.

Comments

Anonymous said…
You can buy an awful lot of magazines for $359.
I'm with you - happy to be wrong so far as E-readers are concerned.

I suspect that they will pass the younger generation by, too - as they grow up they will read on iphones or games consoles (the Nintendo DS already provides many books....)

Sad. Sad.
February 27, 2009 at 3:13 PM
Linda said…
I still want that actual magazine, newspaper or book in my hands!
February 28, 2009 at 5:29 PM
Unknown said…
From what I've seen, the Kindle has its fair share of glitches and annoying habits.

And also that Apple is working on something that will blow it out of the water (as they always must do).

But I do prefer actual paper in my hands. For whatever it's worth.
March 2, 2009 at 9:29 PM
Anonymous said…
I'll put in a good word for the Kindle, speaking as a former skeptic. The biggest reason I had for buying it was the issue of storage you talk about. I didn't have any interest in it until I realized that you can store *hundreds* of books on the thing. That was music to my ears -- I'm forever annexing any flat surfaces to get more shelf space.

Another plus -- you can bookmark, highlight, make notes, and then find all of the above when you need 'em. (I can't ever find that really good quote when I need it the old-fashioned way, but that may just be me.) There are other whiz-bang features, but techhie stuff isn't my thing.

Another plus for me: damn convenient to bring on a trip. If I can't decide which book to bring, the heck with it. It weighs as much as one book and takes up less space than most magazines.

Minuses:
* the cost
* the non-sharing thing
* the screen doesn't do graphics


One in-between: I get what people are saying about wanting to feel a book in your hands. You do get used to reading on a Kindle, and it goes without saying that some things are easier -- can't tear pages, you can hold the Kindle easily in one hand, etc. etc. -- but there's a tactile element that's missing. What I've found is that I complement book- and Kindle-reading. Some things I'd rather read in a book, others in a Kindle.
March 5, 2009 at 11:27 AM
Dave Knadler said…
Thanks, Grace. I don't doubt the many advantages of the device -- that's what worries me. I just dread the day when Amazon corners the market on every printed thing.
March 5, 2009 at 11:33 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sleuths are only as good as their sidekicks

Image
I recently read the much-lauded Wash This Blood Clean From My Hands , by French author Fred Vargas, and like many others found it quirky and engaging. Her deft writing left me happy to have found another series character to follow: Commissaire Adamsberg. But that's not what this post is about. I've decided that others do a lot better job with reviews than I do, and I hate laboring over my shallow insights only to find later that I've echoed what everybody else said a long time before. (And yes, I can hear you saying: "But that's never stopped you before." True enough. Nor will it now.) So, short version: Wash This Blood is a good book. Buy it. But for all the talk about it being "eccentric" or even "kooky," it does share one key device with nearly all other detective fiction: the sidekick. Adamsberg's reliance on gut instinct and intuition is sharply defined by the hard-nosed, scientific approach of his second in command, Capitaine
Read more

That ship has sunk

Image
After a long career in journalism, I'm back in the job market. For a limited time only. All I require are a company car, a five-figure signing bonus and a six-figure salary. If somebody could swing by and clean the house once a week, that would be great too. Until then, guess who's going to be blogging like there's no tomorrow. I've worked at various newspapers for the better part of three decades. I've been a reporter and an editor and there was a time in the mid '90s when I thought I was being very clever by learning HTML. I was thinking: Job security, baby; every newspaper will be on the Internet in a few years. I was right about the last part. But it turns out most people eventually questioned the wisdom of paying for what they could get free. Who knew? Then circulation and ad revenue headed south, and corporate boards figured they could maintain profits by shrinking the product and letting people go. Now circulation and ad revenue are Thelma and Louise: st
Read more

Back to the keyboard -- but it's a new one

Image
After a writing hiatus of quite a few months longer than I intended, I'm back to work on what I will refer to as "the book." I knocked out another 500 words yesterday, and expect to make that the standard day's output. But since I've had these productive impulses before, and since they tend to expire after about a week, I'm employing a few other strategies. First: A new computer! Yep, I have decided that there are too many games on my desktop machine, it's too noisy, and it confines me to one room of the house. So I ordered a new notebook computer from Dell. It's their new 1420 model. Should be here in a couple more weeks -- although you never know with Dell -- and then the only files I'll transfer from my old computer to the new one are my in-progress writing projects. I know what you're thinking: Basically, I'm offering myself a cheap bribe to a commit to a project that will probably take a year -- long after the shiny new computer cease
Read more