In fiction, short is not always so sweet

One of these days I suppose I should admit that my preferred creative form, short crime fiction, is all but dead. When's the last time you enjoyed a good detective yarn that was under, say, 8,000 words? I thought so. Me too -- even though I like writing short stories, I sure don't read many of them these days.

So why am I stuck on short stories? It's not for the money -- Ellery Queen Mystery Magazine, where I've sold most of my work, still pays about the same as it did 40 years ago -- which is to say, very little. Mention those paltry checks to the IRS, and you pay self-employment tax in addition to the tax on the income. It's not for the fame, either -- as far as I can tell, EQMM and its sister publication, Alfred Hitchcock's Mystery Magazine, are two of the least-read periodicals in the nation, coming in just behind Goat Riders Quarterly.

No, the real reason I write short stories is that I'm too daunted by the concept of finishing something that may run 400 pages as opposed to 40. Perhaps I'm too keenly aware of my work history: I've finished a dozen short stories, but out of three or four attempts at novels, I've abandoned all -- at about 40 pages in.

But clearly, I must finish a book at some point. It's been a lifelong goal, and I'm not getting any younger. I have shelves full of books on writing, but one of the titles I always find inspiring is "Telling Lies for Fun and Profit," by crime-fiction master Lawrence Block. I took it down today. Here's what he has to say about writing novels as opposed to short stories:

"... the short story is infinitely more difficult to sell than the novel. The market for short fiction was minuscule when I was starting out 20 years ago. Since then it has consistently shrunk to the point of invisibility."

"Novels aren't harder. What they are is longer. ... What's required, I think, is a change in attitude. To write a novel you have to resign yourself to the fact that you simply can't prime yourself and knock it all out in a single session ... The process of writing the book is going to occupy you for weeks or months -- perhaps years. But each day's stint at the typewriter is simply that -- one day's work. That's true whether you're writing short stories or an epic trilogy. If you're writing three or six or 10 pages a day, you'll get a certain amount of work accomplished in a certain span of time -- whatever it is you're working on."

Hey, Larry; you've talked me into it.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sleuths are only as good as their sidekicks

Image
I recently read the much-lauded Wash This Blood Clean From My Hands , by French author Fred Vargas, and like many others found it quirky and engaging. Her deft writing left me happy to have found another series character to follow: Commissaire Adamsberg. But that's not what this post is about. I've decided that others do a lot better job with reviews than I do, and I hate laboring over my shallow insights only to find later that I've echoed what everybody else said a long time before. (And yes, I can hear you saying: "But that's never stopped you before." True enough. Nor will it now.) So, short version: Wash This Blood is a good book. Buy it. But for all the talk about it being "eccentric" or even "kooky," it does share one key device with nearly all other detective fiction: the sidekick. Adamsberg's reliance on gut instinct and intuition is sharply defined by the hard-nosed, scientific approach of his second in command, Capitaine
Read more

That ship has sunk

Image
After a long career in journalism, I'm back in the job market. For a limited time only. All I require are a company car, a five-figure signing bonus and a six-figure salary. If somebody could swing by and clean the house once a week, that would be great too. Until then, guess who's going to be blogging like there's no tomorrow. I've worked at various newspapers for the better part of three decades. I've been a reporter and an editor and there was a time in the mid '90s when I thought I was being very clever by learning HTML. I was thinking: Job security, baby; every newspaper will be on the Internet in a few years. I was right about the last part. But it turns out most people eventually questioned the wisdom of paying for what they could get free. Who knew? Then circulation and ad revenue headed south, and corporate boards figured they could maintain profits by shrinking the product and letting people go. Now circulation and ad revenue are Thelma and Louise: st
Read more

Back to the keyboard -- but it's a new one

Image
After a writing hiatus of quite a few months longer than I intended, I'm back to work on what I will refer to as "the book." I knocked out another 500 words yesterday, and expect to make that the standard day's output. But since I've had these productive impulses before, and since they tend to expire after about a week, I'm employing a few other strategies. First: A new computer! Yep, I have decided that there are too many games on my desktop machine, it's too noisy, and it confines me to one room of the house. So I ordered a new notebook computer from Dell. It's their new 1420 model. Should be here in a couple more weeks -- although you never know with Dell -- and then the only files I'll transfer from my old computer to the new one are my in-progress writing projects. I know what you're thinking: Basically, I'm offering myself a cheap bribe to a commit to a project that will probably take a year -- long after the shiny new computer cease
Read more